LifeNews.com
reports that Fr. Jenkins is attempting to defend his decision to provide President Obama with an honorary degree and commencement address by stating that both the USCCB
guidelines and Church teaching apply only to Catholics. In other words, since Obama isn't Catholic, he isn't bound to respect "Church teaching" and Notre Dame isn't bound to deprive him of honors, awards, and platforms. Here is the
response I posted on Fr. Z's site:
... only Catholics who implicitly recognize the authority of Church teaching can act in ‘defiance’ of it.”
This is alarming. The pontificates of John Paul II and Benedict XVI have gone to great lengths to explain that the right to life is a tenet of natural law and not a "sectarian" doctrine. Here is Pope Benedict in his March 2006 address to the European People’s Party:
These principles are not truths of faith, even though they receive further light and confirmation from faith; they are inscribed in human nature itself and therefore they are common to all humanity. The Church’s action in promoting them is therefore not confessional in character, but is addressed to all people, prescinding from any religious affiliation they may have. On the contrary, such action is all the more necessary the more these principles are denied or misunderstood, because this constitutes an offence against the truth of the human person, a grave wound inflicted onto justice itself.
Surely Fr. Jenkins is familiar with the manner in which the Church addresses these issues(?). Moreover, the USCCB guidelines are addressed to Catholics but the proscription is not limited to them; the pertinent paragraph reads “those,” not “those Catholics.”
A friend informs me that a sensible
editorial appeared in last weekend's
Catholic Telegraph of Cincinnati. (I somehow missed it.) It is unsigned, but presumably reflects the views of the editors.