This morning, I dialed in to the Mike McConnell show on Cincinnati's WLW while he was discussing Obama and Notre Dame. Callers were confusing the Church's teaching on various social doctrines, e.g., by stating that being in favor of the death penalty and abortion rights are for practical purposes indistinguishable positions, so I tried to present two Church documents that would be persuasive to reasonable listeners.
Unfortunately, I don't believe I did justice to either. A previous caller mentioned the USCCB statement "Catholics in Political Life," and my citations from the Ratzinger Memo were greeted with, essentially, "But Pope John Paul opposed the death penalty, George Bush supported it, and George Bush spoke at Notre Dame. Ergo, Obama should be able to speak there too."
In any event, here are the two statements I referenced ...
From the "
Ratzinger Memo" (written by Pope Benedict in 2004 when he was still head of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith):
3. Not all moral issues have the same moral weight as abortion and euthanasia. For example, if a Catholic were to be at odds with the Holy Father on the application of capital punishment or on the decision to wage war, he would not for that reason be considered unworthy to present himself to receive Holy Communion. While the Church exhorts civil authorities to seek peace, not war, and to exercise discretion and mercy in imposing punishment on criminals, it may still be permissible to take up arms to repel an aggressor or to have recourse to capital punishment. There may be a legitimate diversity of opinion even among Catholics about waging war and applying the death penalty, but not however with regard to abortion and euthanasia.
From the USCCB's "
Catholics in Political Life":
The Catholic community and Catholic institutions should not honor those who act in defiance of our fundamental moral principles. They should not be given awards, honors or platforms which would suggest support for their actions.